Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1
0.156 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +5019%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 500
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy