Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 625 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (29W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 13.20GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 625 OEM
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI +1004%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
825 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
13.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
48
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.748 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
6.992 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
167.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
13.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

29W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy