Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 625M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 625M
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +1451%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 600M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF117
GPU Name
Amethyst
N13M-GS-B-A2
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
5 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy