NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 635M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 635M
0.253 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+5034%
12.99 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 635M
170
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+4123%
7180
Graphics Card
Mar 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
24
96
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
10.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
253.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
21.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
AD107
N12E-GE-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
