CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (49W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 40.06GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
+34%
0.803 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
VS
GeForce GTX 295
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
40.06GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.368 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
33.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
803.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
33.47 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK208
GPU Name
GT200B
GK208-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
49W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5470
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
5
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
6
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
8
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro V5300X
9
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy