Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 640 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 640 +29%
0.693 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
384
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.216 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
28.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
692.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
28.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200
GK107-300-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy