Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 640M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 640M
0.48 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +2043%
10.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
160.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.29 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.29 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
160.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
AD107
N13P-GS
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy