NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M265X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 M265X 's Advantages
Boost Clock625MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
+4%
0.833 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M265X
0.8 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 700M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
625 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
833.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
800.0 GFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Venus
GT 755M
GPU Variant
Venus PRO
(216-0846009)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
