Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.833 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1382%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 700M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
833.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
AD107
GT 755M
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy