NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.833 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
+641%
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 700M
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
682 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
833.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA107
GT 755M
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
