NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock937MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.833 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350
+43%
1.199 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 700M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
747 MHz
-
Boost Clock
937 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
384
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
833.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP107
GT 755M
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1
(N17S-G5-A1)
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
