Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.833 TFLOPS
RTX A4000 Max Q +1614%
14.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 700M
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
384
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.6 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.28 TFLOPS
833.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.28 TFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA104
GT 755M
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy