NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs AMD FirePro M3900
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M
+213%
0.753 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 700M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
160
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
31.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
31.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Seymour
GT 755M
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
