NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M
0.753 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+226%
2.458 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 755M
534
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+489%
3150
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GT 755M
198
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+621%
1429
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 700M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
31.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
31.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU117
GT 755M
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
