CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 150 OEM and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 141W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 150 OEM
0.47 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+2453%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 150 OEM
VS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 100
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
22
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.81 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
47.23 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
470.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
AD107
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Board Design
141W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs AMD FirePro W5100
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4100
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 290
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs AMD Radeon Sky 900
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9150
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs Intel Arc A310
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6930
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs MTT S50
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy