Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs Intel Arc A350M

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs Intel Arc A350M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Arc A350M +819%
1.766 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 100M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
DG2-128
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy