Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD FirePro M2000

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (33W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000 +150%
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 100M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
480
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Turks
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy