Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 21.92GB/s)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
56 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M +33%
0.192 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jul 2007
GeForce 100M
Generation
M7x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
685 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
21.92GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
120
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
M76
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
M76 XT-M (216XJBKA13FG)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy