Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition +1713%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2014
GeForce 100M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1362 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
174.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.482 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
217.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Amethyst
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
5 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy