Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
4368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +3379%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
70
112
Shading Units
4480
56
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
GA100
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy