Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro W7100

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro W7100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
FirePro W7100 +808%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Tonga
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
5 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy