Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro W8000

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +788%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy