Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +403%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
GM206
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy