NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 281W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2525MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
4368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
+12365%
45.25 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Apr 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1895 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2525 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
70
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
4480
56
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
70
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
323.2 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
90.50 TFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.25 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1414 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
281W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
Navi 31
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
