NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
+243%
1.248 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
Lexa
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
