Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro S9000

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000 +733%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy