Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FireStream 9370

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370 +582%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
1600
64
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Cypress
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy