Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +2677%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Vega 10
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy