Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 260M and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 260M
0.264 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition +215%
0.833 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Nov 2013
GeForce 200M
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

12
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.680 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
264.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
833.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.72 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GK107
N10E-GS
GPU Variant
GT 755M
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

38W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy