CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.73GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 106W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
+2905%
0.601 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
VS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
Graphics Card
Mar 2011
Release Date
Jul 2010
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
902 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.080 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.68 GFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GF116
GPU Name
GT218
GF116-200-KA-A1
GPU Variant
8400GS-225-B1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Board Design
106W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
2
AMD Radeon RX 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
4
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
5
ATI Radeon HD 5950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs ATI FireGL V7700
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7510 OEM
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy