Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
0.451 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +531%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
144
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.698 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
18.79 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
451.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
37.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF116
GPU Name
TU116
GF116-200-KA-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

106W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy