CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
0.451 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
+367%
2.108 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
VS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
144
Shading Units
960
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
4.698 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
18.79 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
451.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
37.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF116
GPU Name
GK106
GF116-200-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Board Design
106W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCI
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs AMD FirePro W5000 DVI
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 5490
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI
Related News
1
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
2
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
3
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
4
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
5
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
6
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
7
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
8
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
9
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
10
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy