Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
5232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
0.451 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +14203%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 400
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
84
144
Shading Units
5376
24
TMUs
336
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
84
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.698 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
18.79 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
451.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
37.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF116
GPU Name
Navi 31
GF116-200-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

106W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy