Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
144
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

4.698 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
18.79 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
451.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
37.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF116
GPU Name
RV560
GF116-200-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

106W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy