Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (84.10GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB +807%
2.332 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2018
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1392 MHz
Base Clock
-
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
84.10GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
12
768
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
72.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
36.43 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.332 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
72.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GT215
GP107-301-K1-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy