Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050
1.862 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +172%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1354 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
2816
40
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

46.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
58.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
29.10 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.862 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
58.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
Hawaii
GP107-300-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy