CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs ATI FirePro V3800
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs ATI FirePro V3800
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1708MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
+656%
3.935 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
VS
FirePro V3800
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1708 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
1152
Shading Units
400
72
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
81.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
123.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
61.49 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
123.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
Redwood
GP106-300-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Board Design
120W
TDP
43W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 580 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 570
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA P106 100
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 4650
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy