NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB AMD Radeon R9 FURY

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 5 months late

Boost Clock1709MHz

More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)

Lower TDP (120W vs 275W)

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.2GB/s)

2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

4.375 TFLOPS

Radeon R9 FURY +63%

7.168 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

3909

Radeon R9 FURY +21%

4736

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

16

Radeon R9 FURY +56%

25

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

40

Radeon R9 FURY +37%

55

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

50

Radeon R9 FURY +40%

70

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

VS

Radeon R9 FURY

Graphics Card

Dec 2017

Release Date

Jul 2015

GeForce 10

Generation

Pirate Islands

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz

Base Clock

-

1709 MHz

Boost Clock

-

2002 MHz

Memory Clock

500 MHz

Memory

5GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

HBM

160bit

Memory Bus

4096bit

160.2GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

10

SM Count

-

Compute Units

56

1280

Shading Units

3584

80

TMUs

224

40

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

48 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

1280 KB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

68.36 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

64.00 GPixel/s

136.7 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

224.0 GTexel/s

68.36 GFLOPS

FP16 (half)

7.168 TFLOPS

4.375 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

7.168 TFLOPS

136.7 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

448.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106

GPU Name

Fiji

GP106-350-K3-A1

GPU Variant

Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)

Pascal

Architecture

GCN 3.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

16 nm

Process Size

28 nm

4.4 billion

Transistors

8.9 billion

200 mm²

Die Size

596 mm²

Board Design

120W

TDP

275W

300 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.2

6.1

CUDA

-

6.4

Shader Model

6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 6870

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 285

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD