NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1060 Max Q and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1480MHz vs 1455MHz)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1060 Max Q
3.789 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+135%
8.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 10 Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1063 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
24
1280
Shading Units
3072
80
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
71.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
118.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
59.20 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
3.789 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
AD107
N17E-G1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
