NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+447%
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
400
56
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Redwood
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
