NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1650MHz vs 1590MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
+48%
4.224 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
3566
Radeon Pro 5300
+27%
4558
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Navi 14
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
