NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 24GB VRAM RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2617MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
8064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
+1546%
46.9 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2025
GeForce 16
Generation
Blackwell PRO W
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1590 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2617 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR7
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
70
896
Shading Units
8960
56
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
70
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
251.2 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
732.8 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.90 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.90 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
140W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GB203
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
45.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
378 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
10.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
