NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages

Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1755MHz vs 1125MHz)

More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

2.304 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile +290%

8.986 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

2956

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile +177%

8214

Blender

GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

414

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile +595%

2881

OctaneBench

GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

67

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile +279%

254

GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

VS

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Graphics Card

Apr 2020

Release Date

Jan 2023

GeForce 16 Mobile

Generation

GeForce 40 Mobile

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz

Base Clock

1455 MHz

1125 MHz

Boost Clock

1755 MHz

1250 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

6GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

96bit

160.0GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

16

SM Count

20

-

Compute Units

-

1024

Shading Units

2560

64

TMUs

80

32

ROPs

48

-

Tensor Cores

80

-

RT Cores

20

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

12 MB

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

84.24 GPixel/s

72.00 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

140.4 GTexel/s

4.608 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

8.986 TFLOPS

2.304 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

8.986 TFLOPS

72.00 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

140.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117

GPU Name

AD107

N18P-G61-MP2

GPU Variant

GN21-X2

Turing

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

5 nm

4.7 billion

Transistors

18.9 billion

200 mm²

Die Size

159 mm²

Board Design

30W

TDP

50W

-

Suggested PSU

-

No outputs

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

8.9

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

2

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 570

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

6

Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

7

AMD Radeon RX 6500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q Refresh

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD