Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs AMD Radeon E9172 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs AMD Radeon E9172 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1219MHz vs 1125MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +84%
2.304 TFLOPS
Radeon E9172 MXM
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2017
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Lexa
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
E9170
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy