Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs AMD FirePro M5950

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs AMD FirePro M5950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +231%
2.304 TFLOPS
FirePro M5950
0.696 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.800 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.40 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
696.0 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Whistler
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
Whistler XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy