Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Intel Arc A370M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Intel Arc A370M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Arc A370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1550MHz vs 1515MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3.103 TFLOPS
Arc A370M +2%
3.174 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3436
Arc A370M
3428
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1380 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1515 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.60 GPixel/s
96.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
99.20 GTexel/s
6.205 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.349 TFLOPS
3.103 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.174 TFLOPS
96.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
793.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
DG2-128
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy