NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1515MHz vs 1125MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
+34%
3.103 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2.304 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
+17%
3443
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2932
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
+18%
1559
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
1318
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1380 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1515 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
48.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
96.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
6.205 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
3.103 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
96.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
TU117
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
