Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1515MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile +7856%
3.103 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1380 MHz
Base Clock
-
1515 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

48.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
96.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
6.205 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.103 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
96.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GT218
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
11W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy