NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 219W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+555%
4.416 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
30
1280
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
219W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GT200B
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
