NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages

Lower TDP (100W vs 285W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2610MHz vs 1725MHz)

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

4.416 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB +807%

40.09 TFLOPS

Blender

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

583

GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB +1556%

9659

OctaneBench

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

93

GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB +909%

939

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB

Graphics Card

Nov 2019

Release Date

Unknown

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz

Base Clock

2310 MHz

1725 MHz

Boost Clock

2610 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1313 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

12GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6X

128bit

Memory Bus

192bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

504.2GB/s

Render Config

20

SM Count

60

-

Compute Units

-

1280

Shading Units

7680

80

TMUs

240

32

ROPs

80

-

Tensor Cores

240

-

RT Cores

60

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

48 MB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

208.8 GPixel/s

138.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

626.4 GTexel/s

8.832 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

40.09 TFLOPS

4.416 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

40.09 TFLOPS

138.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

626.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116

GPU Name

AD104

TU116-250-KA-A1

GPU Variant

AD104-400-A1

Turing

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

4 nm

6.6 billion

Transistors

35.8 billion

284 mm²

Die Size

295 mm²

Board Design

100W

TDP

285W

300 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

8.9

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance